Public attribution

Technical contributions

These people explicitly opted in to public attribution for technical contributions or review feedback on RLSOK.

Attribution describes the contribution only. It does not imply endorsement, partnership, customer status, official support, vendor certification, or an organization relationship. No logos are used.

Aleksandr & Alisa

Provided feedback on device identification and calibration data binding to serial numbers.

Xiaoyang

Reviewed DDS command-path trust, path-scoped failure behavior, and the distinction between authenticated evidence and raw ROS graph identity.

Laurentiu Popa

Provided technical review feedback on RLSOK.

Ruddrho Mollik

A ROS 2 Vision-Guided Pick-and-Place Robotic Arm

Provided architecture feedback on selecting camera calibration, robot-camera transforms, workcell setup, and object/bin mapping as execution-relevant inputs.

Aditya Jindal

Independent contributor

Provided lifecycle ERROR/FAILURE continuity feedback on requiring fresh execution authority after invalidating internal state.

Bartosz Burda

selfpatch.ai / ros2_medkit

Reviewer, architecture feedback. Feedback on separating fault and degradation state from execution authorization, and on using available capabilities as the boundary.

Independent feedback. No endorsement, integration, or support relationship implied.

Dr. Denis Stogl

Critiqued the earlier public explanation and later confirmed that the clarified execution boundary is understandable, cleanly separated from ros2_control, and resembles approaches seen previously.

Atsushi Kuwagata

RT Corporation

Clarified the distinct roles of URDF hardware limits, MoveIt planning constraints, ros2_control drive limits, and live encoder/controller posture, helping avoid blindly binding all sources into one execution identity.

Rune Søe-Knudsen

Universal Robots

Provided technical review and clarification regarding Universal Robots ROS 2 driver speed-scaling behavior and the scaled trajectory controller.

This attribution should not be interpreted as an endorsement by either Rune Søe-Knudsen or Universal Robots.

Technical correspondence

Tetsu Yamaguchi

Engineering Assurance Layer (adjacent tool)

Contributed technical feedback on the distinction between Nav2 velocity_smoother limits, command-path semantics, and controller-local behavior following ros-navigation/navigation2#6357. Works on Engineering Assurance Layer, an adjacent tool.

Has not reviewed RLSOK's implementation and does not endorse it.

Attribution data is maintained in the public repository's machine-readable source.